1996-05-07                     Senate Journal                      Page 4128
HB 204                                                                       
Senator Halford requested that the reconsideration on SENATE CS                
FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 204(FIN) be taken up at this time.                   
                                                                               
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 204(FIN) was before                        
the Senate on reconsideration.                                                 
                                                                               
The question to be reconsidered: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR                    
HOUSE BILL NO. 204(FIN) An Act relating to the administrative                  
revocation of a minor's license to drive; creating criminal offenses           
of minor operating a vehicle after consuming alcohol, a minor's                
refusal to submit to chemical test, and driving during the 24 hours            
after being cited for minor operating a vehicle after consuming                
alcohol or refusal to submit to chemical test; establishing penalties          
for these offenses; relating to court ordered drug and alcohol                 
screening, evaluation, referral, and programs; relating to implied             
consent to certain testing if operating a motor vehicle, aircraft, or          
watercraft; relating to an instrument's working tolerance in a                 
chemical breath test; relating to the authority of a court to impose           
a suspended sentence after failure to complete a treatment program             
upon conviction of felony driving while intoxicated or felony refusal          
to submit to a chemical test; relating to the period of time a court           
may consider for determining prior convictions in sentencing a                 
person convicted of felony driving while intoxicated or felony refusal         
to submit to a chemical test; amending Rules 6 and 32.1, Alaska                
Rules of Criminal Procedure, to allow the use of hearsay evidence              
before a grand jury in a prosecution for felony driving while                  
intoxicated or felony refusal to submit to a chemical test and to not          
require a presentence report for a first felony driving while                  
intoxicated or first felony refusal to submit to a chemical test; and          
providing for an effective date pass the Senate?  The roll was                 
taken with the following result:                                               

1996-05-07                     Senate Journal                      Page 4129
HB 204                                                                       
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 204(FIN)                                                              
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                             
Effective Date                                                                 
Court Rule Changes                                                             
                                                                               
YEAS:  20   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford,                    
Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger,            
Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff                                        
                                                                               
and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 204(FIN)                           
passed the Senate on reconsideration.                                          
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective             
date clause.  Without objection, it was so ordered.                            
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule            
changes.  Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was                
referred to the Secretary for engrossment.